<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Benchmarking on Party Onbici Blog</title><link>https://blog.partyonbici.com/tags/benchmarking/</link><description>Recent content in Benchmarking on Party Onbici Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 11:00:00 +1000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.partyonbici.com/tags/benchmarking/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Inside the City Cycling Index: How We Score a City for Cycling — and How It Holds Up to ITDP, BNA, Bike Score, CROW &amp; Can-BICS</title><link>https://blog.partyonbici.com/posts/city-cycling-index-methodology/</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 11:00:00 +1000</pubDate><guid>https://blog.partyonbici.com/posts/city-cycling-index-methodology/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ask two people to name the world&amp;rsquo;s best cycling city and you&amp;rsquo;ll get the same short list — Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Utrecht. Ask &lt;em&gt;why&lt;/em&gt;, or ask where &lt;em&gt;your&lt;/em&gt; city sits, and the conversation gets vague fast.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cycling-friendliness has been measured many times by many excellent programmes. But those scores are usually periodic, proprietary, or limited to a hand-surveyed list of cities. If your city isn&amp;rsquo;t on the list, you&amp;rsquo;re out of luck — and even if it is, the number often arrives once every few years with no way to see the working.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>